Hi,
Me and my team had a couple queries regarding the 1.2 topic.
Firstly, is the focus of the design encouraged to focus on improving the durability of the fencing, as if durability is improved, it will mean less repairs the rangers have to undergo, thus reducing ranger workload as stated, or is there a larger focus we should focus on. Or must we fulfil all areas causing high maintenence and issues, such as weather, corrosion, livestock and durability issues (as stated on the reply to my previous question in this forum).
Secondly, is it sufficent to just focus on fencing for the livestock, such as the cows which are sold as due to this being a source of revenue for the community, it is important to improve its efficency. Or is it necessary/would you recommend also focusing on other fencing, like keeping out wild animals and/or fencing surrounding homes or infrastructure possibly. There is a large possibility for fencing, so we wanted to know if we could pick one, like the keeping the livestock contained, or if it had to apply to all scenarios including fencing.
Also, would it be ok to have a larger estimated upfront cost and also workload for my teams proposed idea, though assume/through some research, that long term it would be worth it as it can be seen as a investment in btoh money, and time.
Lastly, Lama Lama is far from many local businesses. Can we assume that if we are able to get the components shipped, and if the design is simple, the rangers would be happy and skilled to set it up, or would it better to bring in contractors, though could be more expensive and difficult due to the geographical location of Lama Lama.
Me and my team would appreciate any help on these queries!
Thanks!